Tether exits Euro Stablecoin market amid EU regulatory pressures (2024.12.03)

Tether’s decision to discontinue its euro-backed stablecoin, EURT, underscores the evolving dynamics of the European cryptocurrency market as it aligns with the EU’s regulatory ambitions. This move marks a significant moment, given Tether’s stature as the leading stablecoin issuer and its role in shaping global crypto markets.

Why the Shift? 🧐

The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation introduces rigorous requirements for stablecoin issuers, aiming to foster market stability and consumer protection.

This development is indeed a landmark in the evolution of the European crypto and stablecoin markets. Here’s a closer look at the key implications

Regulation Driving Market Consolidation

MiCA’s Role: The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation aims to provide legal clarity but imposes high barriers for issuers like Tether, requiring them to hold significant reserves in bank accounts.

Impact on Issuers: Tether’s exit from the euro-backed stablecoin space illustrates how regulations can lead to market consolidation, where only entities with substantial resources or a willingness to adapt to stringent frameworks remain competitive.

Shift in Strategy: From Issuance to Infrastructure

Tether’s pivot to Hadron and its partnership with Quantoz Payments signals a strategic shift. Rather than directly issuing stablecoins in regulated markets, Tether is positioning itself as a technology provider for other entities to issue compliant stablecoins.

This move could allow Tether to maintain relevance while sidestepping some regulatory complexities.

Potential Market Fragmentation

The creation of a two-tier market—with one set of stablecoins operating under regulatory oversight and another set outside it—could lead to challenges in liquidity and cross-border usage, particularly in jurisdictions like the EU that are prioritizing compliance.

Stablecoins such as USDC, which align with stricter regulatory requirements, may capture a larger share of institutional use cases, while less regulated options cater to other user segments.

Systemic Risks and Profitability Concerns

Tether’s criticism of bank-based reserve requirements raises valid concerns about potential systemic risks to banks. As stablecoins grow, the required reserves could strain traditional banking systems.

Furthermore, Tether has highlighted how investing reserves in government securities is more profitable and secure compared to parking funds in banks, showcasing a fundamental clash between regulatory intentions and operational realities.

Implications for European Crypto Markets

The reduced presence of a major player like Tether could shrink liquidity and limit options for euro-denominated digital transactions, potentially slowing crypto adoption in the region.

However, this opens the door for MiCA-compliant projects, which could usher in more institutional participation.

Broader Industry Maturation

The departure of EURT underscores the growing pains of the crypto industry as it integrates into traditional financial systems. As regulatory clarity increases, the sector may become more stable and institutionalized, though perhaps at the cost of innovation and diversity.

New models that balance regulatory compliance and operational flexibility are likely to emerge, shaping the next phase of stablecoin evolution.

Conclusion

Tether’s decision to exit the EURT market is a bellwether for the crypto industry in Europe, reflecting the broader tension between innovation and regulation. While it highlights the challenges of adapting to evolving rules, it also underscores the industry’s ingenuity in finding new pathways to participate in regulated markets. Whether these shifts lead to greater stability or stifle innovation remains to be seen, but the European crypto landscape is undoubtedly entering a transformative period.

About ECEBiS

At ECEBiS you are going to understand what will change the trajectory of the financial industry. You will develop a transversal view on the forces that are shaping the future financial industry.

From payments and lending to investment and money management, tech providers are actively shaping the future of the financial landscape - even pushing the boundaries of currency itself. You might evaluate the impact of robo-advising on health management and examine portfolio recommendations from a diversified set of RAs and attempt to identify the factors behind proposed splits between asset classes.

ECEBiS is a platform in academic research on new business models and innovative products. We investigate in fast moving sectors that are reshaping the financial world of tomorrow and pioneering new ways of doing business. We want to attract outstanding ECEBiS students in finance with experiences and exposures, who intend to

Doctorate of Business Administration (DBA) in Finance (online, 3 years part-time)
  • develop knowledge on challenges that shape the future of financial industry

  • engage with a program that offers the convenience of online learning with the benefits of accreditation and global reach.

  • raise awareness on the importance of fintech and sustainability in finance

  • identify the best practices in the financial industry to spread positive changes

  • Go beyond the virtual classroom and network with other ambitious executives and entrepreneurs as you expand your credibility and expertise in the world’s most transformative fields.